Platt v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services - Fourth Appellate District, Division One Court of Appeal of California

Platt v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services

By Fourth Appellate District, Division One Court of Appeal of California

  • Release Date: 1990-02-15
  • Genre: Law

Description

Shearn H. Platt, Martha Lessman Katz, Stephen L. Victor, a professional corporation, Rudick & Platt, a professional corporation, and Rudick, Platt & Victor (collectively, Attorneys) appeal from a judgment dismissing their first amended cross-complaint for equitable indemnity against Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services (Coldwell Banker). Attorneys, who have been sued for legal malpractice in the underlying action, contend their cross-complaint should not have been dismissed because (1) equivalent relief is not available by an affirmative defense; and (2) there is no applicable public policy exception to the broad rule permitting one joint tortfeasor to cross-complain against another for equitable indemnity. We agree and reverse.